<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: March</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sophisticateddorkiness.com/2008/08/review-march/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sophisticateddorkiness.com/2008/08/review-march/</link>
	<description>A bookworm journalist blogs on literature and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:26:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.sophisticateddorkiness.com/2008/08/review-march/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grayskyeyes.wordpress.com/?p=274#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I read and reviewed this a few months ago &lt;a href=&quot;http://reviews.rebeccareid.com/march-by-geraldine-brooks/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

In response to the previous commenter, I&#039;d say that reading &lt;em&gt;Little Women&lt;/em&gt; first gives it a different depth. As Kim said in her review, the perspective of Marmee was completely different from March&#039;s perspective. The girls&#039; perspective is different as well. I loved the contrast!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read and reviewed this a few months ago <a href="http://reviews.rebeccareid.com/march-by-geraldine-brooks/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>In response to the previous commenter, I&#8217;d say that reading <em>Little Women</em> first gives it a different depth. As Kim said in her review, the perspective of Marmee was completely different from March&#8217;s perspective. The girls&#8217; perspective is different as well. I loved the contrast!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.sophisticateddorkiness.com/2008/08/review-march/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grayskyeyes.wordpress.com/?p=274#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Becca: I don&#039;t think you need to have read &lt;i&gt;Little Women&lt;/i&gt; to get the plot of &lt;i&gt;March&lt;/i&gt;, but I think it does help give a better context for the novel.  For example, I think the narrative switch in the middle is better knowing the story of &lt;i&gt;Little Women&lt;/i&gt; because I could put that moment into what I remember about the plot, whereas by itself I don&#039;t know if it would be as effective.  I wish that I had re-read &lt;i&gt;Little Women&lt;/i&gt; before &lt;i&gt;March&lt;/i&gt;, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s absolutely necessary to get the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Becca: I don&#8217;t think you need to have read <i>Little Women</i> to get the plot of <i>March</i>, but I think it does help give a better context for the novel.  For example, I think the narrative switch in the middle is better knowing the story of <i>Little Women</i> because I could put that moment into what I remember about the plot, whereas by itself I don&#8217;t know if it would be as effective.  I wish that I had re-read <i>Little Women</i> before <i>March</i>, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s absolutely necessary to get the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bexadler</title>
		<link>http://www.sophisticateddorkiness.com/2008/08/review-march/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>bexadler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grayskyeyes.wordpress.com/?p=274#comment-137</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had this book checked out from my public library for more than a month now, but haven&#039;t started it. My fear is that I won&#039;t get it since I never read Little Women. So, my question to you: Should I read Little Women first, or is it still a good read if I haven&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had this book checked out from my public library for more than a month now, but haven&#8217;t started it. My fear is that I won&#8217;t get it since I never read Little Women. So, my question to you: Should I read Little Women first, or is it still a good read if I haven&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

