Based on page views, the most popular post on this blog is one from back in February 2009 where I commented on a literary analysis of Stephanie Meyer’s Twilight books. That always makes me laugh, since Twilight is almost the exact opposite of what you can normally expect to read about here, but I think the post comes up high on Google.
The post still occasionally gets comments, mostly often along the lines of, “Yeah, maybe this is right, but the books are just fluff so why bother criticizing them this way?” I find this sentiment frustrating — just because a book or television show or movie isn’t “Great Literature” doesn’t mean it is somehow protected from a critical reading. Pop culture is full of books and movies and television that deserve critical attention and a look at the messages they explicitly or implicitly share.
When I read Jennifer Pozner’s Reality Bites Back, a feminist critique of reality television, I finally felt like I was reading a book that got what I’ve been trying to say. And although the book is focused specifically on reality television, I think Posner’s methods of analysis and conclusions can apply equally well to other forms of popular entertainment.
Pozner begins the book with a long discussion of what makes people watch reality television in the first place, eventually concluding:
But while the schadenfreud and escapism factors may get us to tune in, that’s not what hooks us. On a more subconscious level, we continue to watch because these shows frame their narratives in ways that both play to and reinforce deeply ingrained societal biases about women and men, love and beauty, race and class, consumption and happiness in America.
The book then goes on to explore different facets of reality television — drawing source material from an amazing number of shows — to look at the underlying messages the shows present and what might be a problem with those assumptions.
I think one of the skepticism a reader might have about the book is that Pozner is out to “get” people who watch and enjoy reality television. I’m not a frequent reality television watcher, but I’ve been known to sit all the way through a marathon of America’s Top Model or Top Chef or Project Runway on a boring winter Saturday, a fact I didn’t want to be judged for while reading the book. Luckily, taking on the watches doesn’t seem to be Pozner’s point. As she notes in the introduction:
My critique is aimed at the powerful entities that choose to define reality in ways that suit their interests, regardless of what is healthy or dangerous for our culture. I hope this nuanced introduction to feminist media analysis prompts you to ask questions and bring a more active eye to what you watch.
The quote also brings up another point about the book — it’s very feminist. Everything Pozner addresses is considered through the lens of gender and class divisions, which provides only a certain set of insights about reality television. If you don’t agree with feminist thinking, the book may not hit a chord for you. I also think there are other valid lenses to use, and will be curious to see what other books on the topic I can find from other perspectives.
I enjoyed this book best when Pozner was focusing on some of the less obvious problematic message of reality television than on the message I think are fairly straightforward. Her critique of the princess problem of reality dating shows, for example, didn’t really do much for me. Yes, The Bachelor and other shows play up the prince/princess dynamic unfairly, but that seems fairly obvious to me. I was more intrigued with sections that, for example, look at the culture of consumption and materialism present in otherwise well-meaning shows like Extreme Makeover: Home Edition and whatnot. Those were ideas I hadn’t spent a lot of time thinking about yet.
I’ve waited to write my review of this book for awhile because I wasn’t entirely sure what I wanted to say about the book. Now that it’s back at the library, I wish I had a copy to refer to, not just to write this but also to pull out when I need to be reminded of the way a critical reader goes beneath the edited message of a piece of media and pulls out the biases it is built on. I admire the way Pozner is clear about how media analysis works, and reading the book left me open and excited to starting up my own critical faculties again.
I’d also highly recommended heading over to Cass’s (Bonjour, Cass!) review of the book, which I think gives a different — but equally appreciative — perspective to the book.
Other Reviews: Bonjour, Cass! |
If you have reviewed this book, please leave a link to the review in the comments and I will add your review to the main post. All I ask is for you to do the same to mine — thanks!