Review Policy

5 comments

Thank you for your interest in pitching a book for review consideration at Sophisticated Dorkiness. Below you’ll find a relatively detailed outline of what types and formats of books I accept, how I promote my reviews, and my contact information. I encourage you to check out my About Me page, and my Review Archive for a taste of who I am and what I enjoy.

Pitches: I love being pitched books for review, but I only respond to pitch e-mails for books I want to accept. Declining seems like a way to clutter the Inbox. I try to only accept books I’m that fit with my reading tastes because I don’t think it’s fair to an author or myself to agree to review a book that isn’t my genre or style. And I really don’t like writing negative reviews if it’s just because it was a book I wasn’t inclined to like from the beginning.

I do not review every book I accept. Each book is accepted for review consideration.

Book Genres: I am primarily a nonfiction book blogger, so please keep that in mind when sending me pitches.

  • Genres I usually enjoy are literary nonfiction (on almost any topic), essays, memoirs, “straight” nonfiction (media studies, cultural studies, some science, feminism, politics, language, and journalism, mostly), and travel narratives.
  • Genres I don’t like include chick lit, romance, young children’s books, thrillers/horror, mystery, science fiction, self-help, or erotica. I can almost certainly guarantee I will not want to read any book in these areas.

Book Formats: I am happy to wait for finished copies of a book, but will also accept ARCs. I also own a Nook, so will accept egalleys if they work in that format. However, I’m pretty slow about going through my ebook library. I also enjoy audiobooks on CD. I’m also definitely not stuck on new books, so would be happy to review backlisted titles if they’re available.

Blog Tours and Review Timing: I occasionally participate in blog tours – about once or twice a month – so feel free to pitch that. Otherwise, I review books as I can. I try to review new books close to publication date, but it depends on my own reading schedule.

Review Format: Each of my reviews includes a picture of the book, a short plot summary, my opinion on the book, and link a website related to the book (IndieBound, an author’s website, etc.). I also try to link to other reviews and sites of interest about the author or topic if I think it’s applicable. I also try to include a representative quote from the book if it’s related to comments in my review.

I write honest reviews, so if you send me a book I’m going to write what I think. However, I take pride in trying to understand what an author was trying to accomplish and sharing that with my readers, even if it didn’t work for me. Not every book I dislike is bad, and I try to be honest about what I didn’t enjoy so my readers can judge the book themselves.

Other Promotion: I always Tweet my reviews, and am working to be better about posting them on GoodReads.

Blog Stats/Recognition: I can provide more specific blog stats if necessary, but in general I get about 7,500 visitors a month and have about 300 followers via Feedburner. I have a Google Page Rank of 4. In 2009 I was shortlisted for Best Nonfiction Review Blog during Book Blogger Appreciation Week, and in 2010 I won that category. In 2010 I was also a panelist at the inaugural Book Blogger Convention talking about writing and building content.

Compensation: I currently receive no compensation for my reviews, and I am not a part of any affiliate programs.

And in Return? I would love links to my review from author of publicists websites, and am open to having quotes used in publicity materials – just please let me know. Please also attribute all quotations to Kim Ukura and include a URL to the review.

Contact Information:

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Tom Doherty April 10, 2011 at 1:22 pm

Hello, Kim. I hope I can interest you in “The Best Specimen of a Tyrant: the Ambitious Dr. Abraham Van Norstrand and the Wisconsin Insane Hospital.” In 2008 the Wisconsin Historical Society selected the book for its annual “Book of Merit” award from among several dozen submitted including some from its own press and the UW press. Linda Falkenstein gave it a very nice review in the Isthmus Book Quarterly. The Wisconsin Psychiatrist devoted several pages to a terrific and very extensive review. There have been other very positive reviews/mentions. Like Blood Work, it is to some extent a mystery set in the past, and it completely factual and fully documented.
I’d like to mail you a copy. I hope you’ll let me know where to send it. If you decide it’s not for you — well, so it goes.
I’m glad to have discovered your class website.

Reply

Leave a Comment