≡ Menu
Book Riot Review: ‘Monsters in America’ by W. Scott Poole post image

This post first appeared on Book Riot on 10/20/11, which you can read here. I’m really proud of how this review turned out and really excited about the book, which is why I decided to cross-post it here today to celebrate Halloween. Enjoy!

Whether you’re over the whole zombie thing or getting ready to read the next big literary zombie novel, it’s difficult to argue that zombies haven’t made their way into our cultural conversation. According to historian W. Scott Poole, zombies (and vampires) are the “undead monarchs of American popular culture” in part because,

These creatures, flesh eating or blood drinking, decomposing or forever young, appeared as pop culture phenomena at a historical moment when the body had become of central concern in American culture as a vehicle of pleasure, of theological meaning, or of personal happiness (or all three at once). … Perhaps more than any other monster, they are “made in America” as commodities for sale and distribution.

If that explanation for why we have books like Pride and Prejudice and Zombies makes sense to you, or you think that the Twilight phenomenon is “ideologically and aesthetically repugnant,” then Poole’s new book, Monsters in America: Our Historical Obsession with the Hideous and the Haunting, is one you’ll want to pick up.

Poole, an associate professor of history at the College of Charleston, proposes that one way to consider American history is through our horror stories – stories that come from folk beliefs, religious doctrine, and pop culture. By connecting those narratives to the major topics of American history, Poole suggests that monsters in America are both subversive and controlling, terrifying and fascinating.

Unlike many other books about monsters, Poole doesn’t try to use psychology to explain why Dracula terrifies us. Instead, he explores how the idea of the monstrous can be used as a particular lens to explore history – white fears of “monstrous” Africans are reflected in a fascination with Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, post-World War II “creature features” showed humanity’s helplessness in the face of atomic threats, and our current love (or hate) for zombies can be tied to modern obsessions with threats to our bodies.

The best thing about reading Monsters in America is that the book is just plain fun. Poole writes with a clear love of the monsters he is analyzing, and that boyish fascination comes through in every chapter. Poole mentions more than 60 different movies, as many books, and countless historical moments to tie pop culture, sociology, and history together – there’s no way to read this book and not have at least a few cocktail hour tidbits to share.

Admittedly, there are a few academic moments in writing (the book is published by a university press, after all). I mean, Poole uses the word “pedagogy” in the preface, which is a word no one but academics ever use in polite conversation. But for the most part Poole keeps the academic jargon to a minimum, throwing only occasional scholarly citations for colleagues to “munch on like zombies with a nice meaty thighbone.”

For the non-academics in the room, I think it’s fair to say that Monsters in America is a “creepy little survey” of what monsters are and why they scare us. Monsters in America is a book about the stories we tell ourselves, but also how “the line between ‘story and ‘history’ is highly permeable” — just the way we like it.

{ 10 comments }

The Sunday Salon: Library Book Sale Loot

The Sunday Salon.comI couldn’t let another Sunday go by without posting the books I picked up at our local university library book sale earlier this month. I love library book sales, but this one has always been particularly good because there’s such a wide variety of academic and popular nonfiction to choose from. It’s also really well-organized by topic, which makes it easier to browse.

But, without further ado, here’s my pile:

library book sale loot

The first book on the pile is Wildflower: An Extraordinary Life and Mysterious Death in Africa by Mark Seal, which was an impulse grab during my last perusal of the Biography/Memoir table. The book is about Joan Root, an environmentalist and filmmaker, and her life and romance in Africa.

Next is The Orientalist: Solving the Mystery of a Strange and Dangerous Life by Tom Reiss, another grab from the Biography/Memoir table about “a Jew who transformed himself into a Muslim prince in Nazi Germany.” That just sounds awesome.

[continue reading…]

{ 21 comments }
Off the Stacks: ‘In Other Worlds’ by Margaret Atwood post image

Off the Stacks is a weekly-ish feature where I highlight a nonfiction book I’m curious about but will probably run out of hours in the day to actually read. I’m hoping that by highlighting titles this way, I can encourage other people to give the book a try, and, if it’s great, consider nominating it later this year for the Indie Lit Awards. Consider these books stamped with the “Sophisticated Dorkiness Seal of Curious Approval.”

In Other WorldsTitle: In Other Worlds: SF and the Human Imagination
Author: Margaret Atwood
Publisher: Random House
Nonfiction Type: Literary Discussions
Topics Covered: Science fiction, literary forms, speculative fiction, literary theory

What It’s About: In Other Worlds is an exploration of Margaret Atwood’s relationship with science fiction – from her first reading and writing attempts as a child through her studies at Harvard and culminating in her work as a writer and reviewer. The book collects Atwood’s lectures, reviews, and other writing on the topic together in one book.

Why I Want to Read It: MARGARET ATWOOD! SQUEE!

Ok, besides that… I love literary theory and discussions about how genres grow and develop. The book includes an exploration of the differences between “science fiction” and “speculative fiction,” which looks especially awesome.

Who Else Might Like It: Anyone who loves Margaret Atwood, science geeks, literature nerds, people who are awesome.

Reviews: Publishers Weekly | The Book Case |

{ 10 comments }
Review: ‘The Ghost in Love’ by Jonathan Carroll post image

Have you ever read a review of a book that sticks with you so fully that even two years later you can still remember the title of the book and what part of the review made you want to read the book?

That’s what happened with Jonathan Carroll’s book The Ghost in Love, which first got on my radar almost exactly two years ago when a college friend, Ben, who has great tasted in all sorts of books posted a glowingly crazy-sounding review of the book. Every time I’ve got to a used bookstore since then, I’ve gone to the “C” section to see if there are any of Carroll’s books to experiment with.

I found a copy of The Ghost in Love on a trip this summer, and I am so glad that particular review stuck with me because this was a nutty and awesome book.

The Ghost in Love starts with a relatively simple premise:

A man falls in the snow, hits his head on a curb, and dies. But something strange occurs: the man doesn’t die, and the ghost that’s been sent to take his soul to the afterlife is flabbergasted. Going immediately to its boss, the ghost asks, what should I do now? The boss says, we don’t know how this happened but we’re working on it. We want you to stay with this man to help us figure out what’s going on.

The ghost agrees unhappily; it is a ghost, not a nursemaid. But a funny thing happens—the ghost falls madly in love with the man’s girlfriend, and things naturally get complicated.

Honestly, I’d prefer just to send you over to Ben’s review because he sums up the book and my reaction to it more perfectly than I think I will be able to. But I’ll do my best to say something useful in case you decide not to follow my advice and keep reading here.

There are so many pieces of the plot and moments when you can tell Carroll is trying to make A Big Point About Life and Fate and Our Place in the Universe that the story sometimes feels a little out of control. But it’s the good sort of out of control, or at least it was for me. I liked that the book was smart without sacrificing character development or emotional connections and thinky without being hard to read. It just hit all sorts of good notes with me, even if it was more than a little crazy-pants by the end.

If you want another really good review, I’d suggest this one by Fyrefly over at Fyrefly’s Book Blog, which also talks eloquently about the mix of really beautiful Truths with lots of other strange, strange stuff.

{ 16 comments }
Review: ‘The Art of Fielding’ by Chad Harbach post image

When I was walking around Book Expo America on the first day this year, a publicist with Little Brown got my attention and asked if I wanted a copy of The Art of Fielding, a book she said they were heavily promoting at the show. I asked what it was about, and when she replied “Baseball,” I must have made some sort of face because she immediately added something to the effect of, “But it’s not really about baseball!”

When I responded that I actually like baseball, she laugh and told me then it was actually about baseball if I wanted it to be. Oh, marketing.

The Art of Fielding takes place at Westish College, a small school on the shores of Lake Michigan. Henry Skrimshander is the baseball team’s star shortstop, on his way to baseball stardom. But when one throw goes awry, Henry’s future is threatened by overwhelming self-doubt. The throw also upends four other lives — Owen, Henry’s gay roommate and teammate; Guert, the college president; Mike, Henry’s best friend and the team captain; and Pella, Gert’s recently-returned daughter. The Art of Fielding follows these five characters through the baseball season as the year counts down.

I loved the way author Chad Harbaugh was able to write about so many different kinds of things. The Art of Fielding is not a short book — my ARC comes in at more than 500 pages — but Harbaugh uses that length to explore so many themes and ideas… life at a small college, the life of a sports team, what it’s like to grow up and try to find a career, finding yourself, moving back home, illicit affairs, confused sexuality, natural talent versus practiced excellence, the pursuit of perfection… the list could really go on. The point is, Harbaugh hits all of these notes almost perfectly.

My one critique about the book was that I didn’t feel like the five main characters developed at the same pace. Owen, in particular, felt more like a plot point rather than a real character with ambitions and complications for much of the book. And, interestingly, Henry also felt one-dimensional for a lot of the story because so much of it focused on his fall from grace and the responses of the people around him.

After finishing the book and thinking on it for awhile, I think what the publicist said is actually true — The Art of Fielding is about baseball, but it doesn’t necessarily have to be. Harbaugh uses baseball as a way to explore teamwork, family, perfection, ambition, commitment, and growing up in a book that offers as much love to Herman Melville as it does to a well-played line drive. I don’t think you have to love baseball in order to enjoy this book, but I do think you need to have an appreciation for some of these themes in order for the book to hit most effectively.

{ 12 comments }