≡ Menu
Interview: Mitchell Zuckoff, ‘Lost in Shangri-La’ post image

While I don’t do a ton of author interviews here on the blog (I do plenty of interviews as part of my day job!), I always get a thrill when I have the chance to ask more experienced writers and journalists to talk a little bit about their craft.

Mitchell Zukoff, the author of this year’s winner of the Indie Lit Award for NonfictionLost in Shangri-La, was gracious enough to answer questions put together by the nonfiction panel including how he found the topic the story, what it was like to travel to New Guinea during research, and one piece of writing advice he offers his students.

How did you decide upon this particular topic for your book? What led you to this story?

I was researching a different World War II story when I came across an article in the Chicago Tribune from June 1945 that knocked me for a loop. The article explained that a military plane had crashed in an impossibly remote valley of New Guinea that had been nicknamed Shangri-La. Twenty-one people had been killed, but three survivors – two soldiers and a beautiful member of the Women’s Army Corps – were awaiting rescue by giant gliders that were supposed to be dropped to the valley floor, then snatched back into the air by passing planes.

I wouldn’t be much of a journalist if I hadn’t stopped everything to read that article! I was stunned that I had never heard about this, and apparently no one else had, either. I knew immediately that it was worth pursuing, but I didn’t know – and I wouldn’t know for more than a year – whether I’d be able to collect enough documentary material and human sources to turn it into a book.

In your introduction you mention coming across a host of documents about the crash – a journal, photographs, scrapbooks, and film. What was the most exciting piece of evidence that surfaced?

On one hand, it’s probably the diary that Margaret Hastings wrote about her experiences. That gave me incredible material to work with. But the real breakthrough moment during the early phases of the research was finding that Earl Walter, who led the paratrooper team into the valley, was still alive. Earl was able to give me a firsthand account of these events, and he generously shared not only his memories but also his scrapbooks, the journal he kept during the mission, and dozens of photographs he took that now appear in the book.

In 1945, Earl was a dashing young paratrooper captain eager to get into the action of the war. His father was leading a group of Filipino guerrillas in the jungles of the Philippines, and Earl wanted to prove that he was his father’s equal. Earl was 88 when we met, and there was still a bit of that gung-ho young man in him. Although his short-term memory wasn’t strong, he remembered every detail of the Shangri-La rescue mission. In fact, he described the people, places and events in rich detail, in ways that no documents could match. I’m happy to say that Earl is still alive, and I consider him a friend.

[continue reading…]

{ 13 comments }
Review: ‘Raised Right’ by Alisa Harris post image

Title: Raised Right: How I Untangled My Faith from Politics
Author: Alisa Harris
Genre: Memoir
Year: 2011
Acquired: The book was sent to me by Kate (The Parchment Girl) because I told her I was excited to read it; thanks Kate!
Rating: ★★★½☆

Review: I have to admit, part of the reason I wanted to Raised Right by Alisa Harris this book was a sort of voyeurism. As a person not raised going to church or even ascribing to a particular religious philosophy (other than my mom’s constant advice to “Do unto others and you would have them do unto you”), I have a really hard time understanding where religious, right-wing politicians are coming from when they so deeply connect religion and politics. In fact, it rubs me the wrong way so much that it’s almost impossible for me to take a candidate from the Religious Right seriously.

Harris’ memoir was, I think, a great vehicle for me to get stared trying to learn about this movement, in the sense that Harris and I have a similar sensibility (other than the whole religious upbringing thing), or at least a similar love for writing and writing as thinking. A former young journalist, Harris notes in the introduction that the book is as much a memoir as a way for her to write and explore her own faith and politics:

Writing is not just how I communicate my thoughts, but how I actually think. It’s the way an experience of fleeting thought becomes real to me instead of floating away. It’s the way I catch my thoughts and turn them over, testing their weight and deciding to keep them or throw them again. For me, to write is to become, and I can’t become that older, wiser person without skewering these youthful thoughts to paper without holding them up for my scrutiny and yours.

I should back up a little bit. In Raised Right, Harris writes about her upbringing in a deeply religious family that spent time picketing abortion clinics. Harris was home-schooled in a very Christian-Republican curriculum, where faith and Republican politics were deeply intertwined. After leaving for college, Harris was forced to start confronting the fact that the world is a more complex place, with more complex people, than she was raised to believe was possible.

Raised Right isn’t a perfect book, despite how much I enjoyed reading it. In her struggle to write her way to understanding, Harris loses a sort of cohesive narrative to the book. There’s not a good sense of time — when particular events take place to give them context — or forward momentum to the storytelling. The memoir is really more of a series of topical essays exploring issues like abortion, immigration, and poverty than a memoir as I tend to think of them.

I think what I liked about the book was the way that Harris constantly sought a more nuanced explanation for issues that we’ve been trained to see in black and white. Although sometimes, like with abortion, this leaves her without a clear stance on the issue, it does go to show that even thinking people can come to different — yet equally valid and acceptable — feelings on the same subject. In a public discourse that actively tries to discourage nuance, I thought this was refreshing and interesting.

I don’t think this is Harris’ final book that will explore the way faith and politics intersect and contradict each other, and for that I’m glad. Although she struggles to come to many conclusions in Raised Right, I appreciated learning about her life and seeing issues from a perspective that is well outside of my own.

Other Reviews: the parchment girl | Biblio Sue |

If you have reviewed this book, please leave a link to the review in the comments and I will add your review to the main post. All I ask is for you to do the same to mine — thanks!

{ 19 comments }
Indie Lit Awards: Reflections and Discussions post image

Last week, the winners of this year’s Indie Lit Awards (book awards given out by literary bloggers) were announced, and I posted reviews of all five shortlisted books here on the blog. But in the frenzy of posting all those reviews (and getting to write about a Hunger Games-related book in time for the movie premier), I didn’t get to spend much time reflecting on the awards more generally. Hence, the topic of today’s post.

First, as a reminder, here are the five books we considered for the nonfiction short list this year:

It’s a hefty list. This year, the awards split nonfiction and biography/memoir into two categories, which I think was a good decision. Last year, our panel struggled to compare memoirs with more general nonfiction because they’re often so different from each other in scope, tone, and topic. I think separating them allowed the memoirs to have a more even footing to be compared on, although I could see switching it to nonfiction/biography and memoir.

The biggest challenge I think the nonfiction panel faced this year was that we each gravitated towards different topics and styles. When we did an initial round of ranking the books, four of the five books were picked as the favorite by a panelist. That made it challenging to narrow down the books and pick a winner. However, it also helped that we all mostly enjoyed each of the books, which is a fun problem to have.

One of the interesting discussions that came up as we were talking about all five books (but particularly as we were trying to come to a decision about Lost in Shangri-La versus Berlin 1961) was the question of scope. Does great nonfiction have to take on big topics (the Cold War), or can a book with a smaller story (a single plane crash) have the same impact? Does a large scope make a book better or more important than a more narrow focus?

Although the book with a more narrow focus ended up the winner in this situation, I don’t think we as a panel ever really came to a solid answer on that one (nor do I think there is a single answer). In this case, the fact that Lost in Shangri-La was so well-written and compulsively entertaining helped elevate it to the winner for most of us, but I am still thinking about the scope question (so much so that I think a question of scope will be part of April’s Bloggers’ Alliance of Nonfiction Devotees discussion).

I’m glad I did the Indie Lit Awards again this year because it brought both new books into my reading plans and gave me the motivation I needed to pick up some other books I’d meant to read but simply skipped. I hope you’ll check out the reviews and will be able to find one on our short list to try.

{ 6 comments }

The Sunday Salon.com I’ve been on an amazing reading streak this month. Of the eight books I’ve finished so far, I’ve given five of them an initial rating of five stars on the big Google Docs spreadsheet I track my books on. Sometimes that number changes when I sit down to write my review, but I doubt these will change by much. They’re all pretty awesome.

What’s been more amazing about the books is that I’ve felt this deep sense of gratitude after finishing each one. This sense of being thankful that each author took the time to write these books and that these books, somehow, improbably, found their way to me so I could invest my time reading them. There’s just so much to be thankful for in that.

I suppose I should tell you what the books are. So far, I’ve only written about how awesome Best American Essays 2011 is as a collection. I haven’t written reviews of the others yet because I can’t quite find what to say, but here they are:

  • Methland by Nick RedingMethland, a story of the rise of methamphetamine and the battle against it in small towns, reminded me of what really well-executed and important narrative nonfiction can do. It’s a perfect example of why I love that form of writing and what it can do when done well.
  • House of Stone by Anthony ShadidHouse of Stone is a beautiful, melancholy memoir. Although knowing that Shadid recently passed away while reporting in Syria makes it more wistful than it would otherwise feel, it’s still a moving look at home, family, and identity.
  • Devil in the Grove by Gilbert King — The terrible, awful things that happened in the United States before the Civil Rights movement are written about so clearly in this book that I finished with a sense of outrage I haven’t felt after reading a book in a long time.
  • Wild by Cheryl Strayed — I just finished Wild this morning, and I’m still sort of buzzing about it. Strayed writes so deeply and honestly and beautifully about an experience that seems impossibly hard that I can’t quite fathom it yet.

It’s been awhile since I felt like I finished so many truly excellent books so close together. Usually there’s a clunker in the middle, a book that just felt off in some way but that I felt compelled to finish anyway. But not this time. Even the other book I finished in the middle of this streak, The Reconstructionist by Nick Arvin, was a great book. Not quite as amazing, but still very good.

Ok, I probably need to stop gushing now. I need to harness all of this, “OMG! I LOVE BOOKS!” energy into something useful like review writing or responding to comments or, dare I say it, reading some more.

I know I promised to write some general thoughts about the Indie Lit Awards today, but I think that’s going to have to wait until another day. Oh, and about The Hunger Games movie, which the Boyfriend and I went to see last night. It was pretty awesome; I was impressed. I don’t even want to count how many times I’ve written “awesome” in this post — I need some new adjectives.

Happy Sunday! What are you reading today?

{ 22 comments }
Re-Review: ‘The Girl Who Was on Fire’ edited by Leah Wilson post image

Last May, the publicity team at BenBella Books offered me a copy of a collection of critical essays about Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games series, The Girl Who Was on Fire. In celebration of The Hunger Games movie, BenBella Books has released an updated, movie tie-in edition of the book with three new essays and, if you buy the ebook edition, bonus movie content a week after the film is released. According to a press release they sent out with the book,

On March 23, 2012, the film The Hunger Games, starring Jennifer Lawrence, hits theaters—and one week later, Smart Pop will provide e-book buyers with those YA authors’ thoughts about the film.

“With our book, we envisioned e-book buyers being able to read the book while waiting for the movie, then pick up their e-reader of choice after they see the film and find fresh content there waiting for them—all as part of a single book package, and a single purchase,” said Smart Pop editor-in-chief Leah Wilson.

There is also an option to buy a “Booster Pack” ebook, which includes the three new essays and the movie content a week later. I was a big fan of the original collection, so when BenBella Books offered to send me a copy of the updated, movie tie-in addition to check out the new essays, I was really excited.

After reading the new edition and revisiting some of my favorite essays from the original, I’m happy to say that the three new essays are a great addition to the book and I think help round-out the discussion in some interesting ways.

[continue reading…]

{ 9 comments }